Mazsihisz has decided to boycott; a portrait of Viktor Orbán by Miklós Jancsó

As usual, there are more topics than can be squeezed into the usual length of my posts. The news of the day is Mazsihisz’s decision to stick to their guns and boycott the Hungarian Holocaust Memorial Year unless there is a radical change in the government’s plans. Mazsihisz wants the government to abandon the memorial to Germany’s 1944 invasion of Hungary. The leaders of the organization also want to stop the erection of a new center devoted to the memory of child victims of the Holocaust. They object to being excluded from the planning stage of this project. Although the decision issued today doesn’t mention it specifically, the Jewish leaders are most suspicious of the intentions of the historian entrusted with the execution of the project– Mária Schmidt, whose views on the Holocaust are quite controversial. In addition, there is the problem of Sándor Szakály as the director of the Veritas Institute. The Jewish leaders object only to his comments about the Kamenets-Podolskii deportation but, let’s face it, his appointment is unacceptable altogether.

Photo Attila Kovács / MTI

Photo Attila Kovács / MTI

The first reports on Mazsihisz’s boycott have already appeared in the international press, and I assume that more will follow. We’ll see how Orbán gets himself out of the corner he’s painted himself into.

Now let’s change topics. Although I didn’t mention it earlier, the famous Hungarian film director and screenwriter Miklós Jancsó died at the age of 93 on January 30. Perhaps his most famous creation was The Round Up (1965). Those who would like to know more about the man who became something of an idol in Hungary can read several English-language biographies of him on the Internet. His obituary appeared in The New York Times immediately after his death. By contrast, the Hungarian government and Viktor Orbán were silent.

Orbán himself never said a word about his passing, and it took the government a whole week before Zoltán Balog, minister of human resources, announced that the government will give Jancsó a state funeral. The reason for the delay? Miklós Jancsó deeply disliked Viktor Orbán and I assume the feeling was mutual. Perhaps it was the open letter Miklós Jancsó and Ferenc Grunwalsky, another Hungarian film director, wrote to Viktor Orbán on April 14, 2002 that made Viktor Orbán hate the film director. Keep the date in mind. It was almost twelve years ago, right after Viktor Orbán made that infamous speech in which he declared that the election must be won. Otherwise, Hungary is ruined. His message was that if you are a Hungarian you must vote for Fidesz, the only legitimate representative of the nation. The other political side is the enemy. It was that speech that prompted Jancsó and Grunwalsky to write their letter.

The open letter was again made available online, and I recommend that Hungarian speakers read it. It is priceless. I really should translate the whole letter one day. It should be compulsory reading for those who think that the first Orbán administration was a great deal better than the second. Yes, maybe in degree because he didn’t have a two-thirds majority, but all the essential elements of the present Orbán regime were already there. And they were frightening even then.

The authors of the letter posed twelve questions to Viktor Orbán.

First. “Can anyone say about himself that if he does not become prime minister of the country then Hungary will go astray”? The answer is NO.

Second, can you say, Viktor, that if three million don’t vote for you then “our families, our children, our human dignity, our freedom, our faith and our homeland will be in danger”? The answer is NO.

Third. Hungary is not in bad economic shape, there is no natural disaster that would threaten us. There are no foreign enemies. Is it permissible to create a feeling of danger that is lurking against the country? The answer is NO.

Fourth. Do you have the right to incite people against each other, create mass hysteria and then talk about love? The answer is NO.

Fifth. Can it happen in a democratic country that the homeroom teacher in school asks the children for whom their parents will vote and that those children whose parents aren’t planning to vote for you receive indoctrination about changing their parents’ mind? Is it normal that the teachers demand answers to whether the children could convince their moms and dads to stand by the government? The answer is NO.

Six. Is it normal to frighten people with such an eventuality that all accomplishments, everything under the sun will collapse if the government is not in your hands? The answer is NO.

Seven. Do you have the right to defend your power that much? Do you have the right to appropriate the national colors? The answer is NO.

Eight. You consider yourself a prophet? You are NO prophet. It would be blasphemy on your part. In everybody there is a little messiah but the trouble begins when it comes to the surface.

Nine. Must the whole country live among constant slogans? The answer is NO. WHAT FOR?

Ten. Did you ever ask women what kind of life they want to lead? Did you think through what kind of role you assign to them within the family? We think YOU DIDN’T.

Eleven. Are you sure that your children want to live the way you imagine? Do you know that half the country doesn’t even have a chance for such a life? The economic crisis you talk about so much inflicted the greatest hardship on the poor. Did you think how as a young lawyer you would be able to bring up four children? Could you afford it? NO. Everybody knows that.

Twelve. In your opinion in the past few years how many young people became rich? Who could afford three or four children? In your experience could young people with a respectable job become rich? Could they buy real estate, factories, agricultural land, vineyards? NO. Everybody knows that.

In addition to these questions there are a few memorable sentences in this letter. For example: “Your key word is ‘akarat’ (Das Willen). One must will and dare and then all will become true. Better future, beautiful country, great dreams. Moreover, everything which is, will be. ‘Az akarat diadala’ (Macht des Willens). Viktor! This is the title of Leni Riefenstahl’s film about the 1934 party congress. An uncomfortable similarity in megalomania and in extravagant hunger for power. And meanwhile on the telephone the messages arrive from your office: ‘Viktor Orbán loves you.’… Such a leader, such a world existed before and it has no place here anymore.”

Advertisements

60 comments

  1. @Wolfi: thanks, I missed the Die Welt piece. This of course weakens my thesis according to which the conservative Western European media are reluctant to cover the subject because of the upcoming elections (which don’t look good at all for the EPP).

  2. The Western media might also be reluctant to cover Hungary at the moment, because Russia is a far more interesting topic, and far more relevant in most people’s minds. In the UK, there seems to be several pieces each day on that country’s discriminatory regulation, Putin’s strangle-hold over the media, etc. Covering Hungary would be the same kind of topic area, but somewhat less relevant for the average reader/listener.

  3. The Nature of the Orban/KGB Mind Games

    Has anyone notice that Hungarian tv–not one channel–is showing the Sochi olympics?
    I’ve found that rather strange since Hungarians like their sport, in fact, two commentators
    were sent to the Super Bowl to report live from the scene.

    So why do you suppose there’s no Sochi? After all, there are some 12 or 13 Hungarian athletes competing, too.

    Well, here’s my best try at Pavlovian psychology: keep something away from people and they’ll start desiring it. Thus, no olympics, no Sochi, elicits a desire for Olympics…Sochi…Russia!

    There you have it: before you know it, the somnambulant magyars will be in love with all things Russian. (Can the pictures of Putin/Orban/Stalin on the walls of classrooms be far behind?)

  4. Petöfi, that’s not true! Maybe you’re watching the wrong channels?

    My wife watched the ice skaters yesterday and the day before in the evening on M1 and today M2 is covering Sochi – they probably paid for the rights, that’s why the commercial chammels are showing nothing/not much (I don’t know because I’m not watching)

  5. wolfi :
    Petöfi, that’s not true! Maybe you’re watching the wrong channels?
    My wife watched the ice skaters yesterday and the day before in the evening on M1 and today M2 is covering Sochi – they probably paid for the rights, that’s why the commercial chammels are showing nothing/not much (I don’t know because I’m not watching)

    I have all the channels–no olympics and no discussion of events even. I had to watch on internet.

  6. Orban has assembled his new (6th?) history distortion institute cum government agency, called Committee of National Memory=Remembrance or, rather “Pamyaty”.

    3 members graduated from the Catholic University, 1 from the Calvinist University and 1 from a public university. They are appointed for 9 years. The infamous Maria Schmidt was the thesis advisor of one of them.

    This is how its members reason why their new committee is needed:

    Ms. Bank: “we needed this committee, because there are similar institutes in every other former member states of the Soviet bloc”

    Mr. Ötvös: “this is still the smallest of such institutions”

    Mr Soós: ” we still do not know what happened to the titanium that the Soviets obtained from the Hungarian bauxite or who stopped the Hungarian motor bicycle industry”

    Mr. Máté: “we will not investigate the former domestic spies [including almost every bishops], because they were victims themselves”

    http://nepszava.hu/cikk/1010515-nem-ugynokokre-vadasznak-majd

    The members do not need a PhD degree, a Masters suffices. They have 2 months of paid vacation per year. They are paid at the same level as undersecretaries.

    15.§
    The committee can make “ex cathedra” statements about history that cannot be questioned or sued even after the expiration of their term !

    20.§ i) They will assist the prosecutors.

    23.§ (3) They can investigate only the era of the Communist dictatorship, which starts on December 21, 1944 [!!!].

    http://net.jogtar.hu/jr/gen/hjegy_doc.cgi?docid=A1300241.TV

    The law itself contains history falsification:
    December 21, 1944 was the day when the Temporary National Assembly convened in Debrecen and declared that Hungary is no longer an ally of Nazi Germany.

    The government the Assembly set up was not Communist at all.
    It was headed by a general form the Horthy era, who switched sides on the day
    of the Nyilas coup d’etat.

    The key posts of Interior Minister, Justice Minister, Finance Minister, Foreign Minister, Defence Minister were not Communists. (Once I read that General Vörös was a very negative figure in 1944 (including the deportations), but the Soviets mistook him for a certain Veress).

    The Communists had the trade, welfare and agriculture portfolios only.

    Whoever wrote the law to set up this committee is a crypto-Nazi, in my opinion.
    (by declaring implicitly that first governments that were no longer Nazi or Nyilas were Communist)

Comments are closed.